Answer:
Explanation:
Essay Segment or Quote Rubric Rating Comments
Briefly describe ONE major difference between Nash’s and Maier’s historical interpretations of the origins of the American Revolution.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Nash’s argument.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Maier’s argument.
3
2
1
The response to (a) did not earn a point because it is does not adequately describe the arguments of Nash and Maier. It merely lists the idea that Maier believed the Revolution emerged from old ideas, and Nash believed the Revolution was based on new ideas.
The response to (b) earned 1 point by providing evidence that the Boston Tea Party was a specific event that demonstrated the colonists’ rebellion against Great Britain’s taxation, which supports Nash’s argument. The response to
(c) did not earn a point because the Boston Massacre does not support Maier’s argument that the Revolution originated from earlier revolutionary thought.
The Progressive Era was primarily concerned with making government responsible for the needs of the people.
Answer:
answer is c . as charlemagne had nothing to do with these lands
Explanation:
plz mark as brainliest if it helps you
Answer:
Explanation: The difference is found in the following aspects: Americans have their cultural taxonomy based on 6 groups that make up the ethnography of that country. They are: Whites, blacks, Native Americans, Asians, Hawaiians and those who are made up of two races, that is, the so-called multiracial. The Brazilian ethnography is also composed of 6 types of races, which are: White, black, brown, yellow, indigenous and race without any statement. It is at this point that the difference in racial taxonomy between these two countries is found.
The answer you are looking for is True.
