1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Xelga [282]
3 years ago
11

The Supreme Court case Regents v. Bakke involved which of the following? A. police brutality B. women's rights C. trial by jury

D. affirmative action
History
2 answers:
MakcuM [25]3 years ago
6 0
The answer to that question is D<span />
Basile [38]3 years ago
3 0

<em>Regents of the University of California v. Bakke </em>(1978) involved the concept of:

<h2>D. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION</h2>

Details:

The Supreme Court's decision gave some credence to Allan Bakke's claim that the University of California at Davis had practiced some amount of reverse discrimination in denying him admittance to the medical school because he was not an economically or educationally disadvantaged member of one of four racial/ethnic groups eligible for their special admission program.  But the Court was careful to note that race could be considered as a factor (among many factors) in college admissions, if  schools practiced great care in doing so.  Having a basic quota system, such as UC Davis reserving 16 spots out of 100 each year, was considered discriminatory.

The essence of the decision in<em> Regents of the University of California v. Bakke </em>was that the Court upheld affirmative action.  It allowed race to be considered as one of several factors in college admission policy.  But establishing specific racial quotas was an approach that the Court said was not allowable.  

You might be interested in
What Statement describes federalism
lesya [120]
Federalism is a system of government in which the same territory is controlled by two levels of government. Generally, an overarching national government is responsible for broader governance of larger territorial areas, while the smaller subdivisions, states, and cities govern the issues of local concern
8 0
3 years ago
What benefits do Mexico, Canada, and the United States gain by maintaining a trade agreement among the three nations
Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:

Quadrupled Trade

Lowered Prices

Increased Economic Growth

Created Jobs

Increased Foreign Direct Investment

Reduced Government Spending

Explanation:

Between the United States, Canada, and Mexico, NAFTA covered the largest area under a free trade agreement. One of the positive effects of NAFTA was increased trade, economic output, foreign investment, and better consumer prices. NAFTA went into effect under the Clinton administration in 1994. The purpose of the deal was to boost trade within North America between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. It also aimed to get rid of trade barriers between the three parties, as well as most taxes and tariffs on goods imported and exported by each.Canada has seen the strongest gains among the three NAFTA countries, though, again, it is difficult to attribute direct causation, particularly given that Canada and the United States had a free-trade deal that predated NAFTA.

6 0
3 years ago
Britain’s forces had all of these advantages going into the American Revolutionary war EXCEPT A) more military experience. B) mo
azamat

D is the correct answer.

The British Army was the far superior force. The British Navy was the far superior force. Britain was also a manufacturing powerhouse.

But the British Army was fighting to preserve something while the Revolutionaries were fighting for their rights and to start something new.

This question is delightfully biased but it is true that the Americans, by and large, were more committed to the fight.

6 0
3 years ago
Why did hunter-gatherers migrate? Choose five answers.
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

to locate food

to identify water sources

to escape droughts

to escape natural disasters, such as floods

to find resources to make tools

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the consequences of the conflict between the native americans and the white settlers?
den301095 [7]
The consequences of the conflict between the native americans and the white settlers was that the proclamation line was put in place to keep peace
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE LOOK! and see if you can answer ANY!!
    13·1 answer
  • Can you please help me
    8·1 answer
  • Summarize what causes foliated metamorphic textures to form.
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the Founding Fathers compromise on using a federal system for the new government?
    11·2 answers
  • What did the sons of liberty do to protect the stamp act
    5·2 answers
  • How might have BRAT and the Treaty of Versailles have caused World War II?
    7·1 answer
  • During the age of exploration, which of the following countries did NOT establish colonies in
    11·1 answer
  • What material is painted on the bandages to glue them together
    14·1 answer
  • If John Winthrop was not clergy, why was he able to preach a sermon
    12·1 answer
  • NaOH + HCl → H2O + NaCl The reactant side of the chemical equation has_____atom(s) each of sodium, oxygen, and chlorine.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!