The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
For the ethical researcher, the major problem with deception is that it tends to involve direct attacks on other people’s consent.
And of course, that is not ethical and professional researchers and companies shouldn't ever do that.
Researchers need to be very honest and clear about the purpose of research, the instruments used, the risks -if there are any- and the way results are going to be used.
Researchers also have to get the written consent from the people that are going to be part of the study. This way, participants are going to be aware of any details.
Attalupa was the last sapa inca and Pizarro was the dude who killed him
Answer:This is most consistent with INNOVATION form of adaptation in Merton’s theory of strain
Explanation:
Robert Merton focused on explaining why people tend to commit to deviant behavior within society and he opposed the other theorists who believed that it is derived by individual motives. Merton argued with these theorists by suggesting that some people feel that the only way to adjust in a normal way within society is to turn to criminal activities to alleviate their critical situation. He referred into anomie or strain theory , anomie which state that
due to confusion of what is happening in one's life and how hard they find it to achieve certain goals in a normal way they will resort to criminal activities.
The first way is to conform to society which means accept what ever is defined by society by pursuing success only in the ways acceptable within society such as education and earning money through a job.
The second reaction is innovation , this refers mostly to criminal act these are people who still believe they must pursue success just they innovate their own ways to pursue that success. They turn to deviant behavior because they want to achieve the success expected from them just that they use deviant innovations.
Such as the student above , he want to do well in school hence he innovate cheating as a way to help him achieve this goal.
Answer:
B. Conservative
Explanation:
Liberal : Tends to favor more government involvement in economy and more social programs by increasing citizens' taxes.
Conservative : Tends to favor less government involvement in economy and let the free market determine the distribution of wealth. Typically, they also prefer lower taxes to give businesses more control over their expense.
Moderate: A healthy mixture between Liberal and Conservative.
The Description above fit to conservative point of views. Pay attention to these key phrases:
<em>- Our society needs to embrace a free-market society.</em>
<em>- . . . where private enterprise is encouraged creates the greatest opportunity and can lead to the highest standard of living . . .</em>
<em>- Increased government regulation will place a stranglehold on business . . . .</em>
<em>- Lower taxes create more incentive for people to work . . .</em>
<em>- Government programs encourage people to become dependent and lazy . . . .</em>
Question:
Why do you think Lincoln didn't end slavery in the north?
Answer:
The proclamation didn't end slavery because it didn't affect the border slave states that weren't in rebellion, and it had no immediate effect in most of the deep South because, at least on the day it was issued, the slaves were in territory still controlled by the Confederacy.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.
In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.
-Alan Becker
