Is there an outlier in the data set? Explain your reasoning.
2 answers:
You might be interested in
The correct pair is option E, which is:
FH ≅ FH - reflexive property
ΔGFH ≅ ΔEFH - SAS theorem
<h3>What is the SAS Congruence Theorem?</h3>The SAS theorems states that two triangles are congruent if they have two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent included angles.
<h3>What is the Reflexive Property?</h3>The reflexive property of geometry states that an angle or line will always be congruent to itself.
In the two column-proof, since FH = FH using the reflexive property, then both triangles are congruent to each other by the SAS congruence theorem.
The missing pair of reasons that completes the proof are:
FH ≅ FH - reflexive property
ΔGFH ≅ ΔEFH - SAS theorem
Learn more about the SAS theorem on:
#SPJ1
