Answer:
debit Rent Expense, $1,500; credit Prepaid Rent, $1,500.
Explanation:
Answer: True
Explanation:
According to the CDC, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is the leading cause of children dying unexpectedly and without immediately apparent causes and is said to happen to an 3,700 infants annually.
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is defined by the CDC as <em>the sudden death of an infant less than 1 year of age that cannot be explained after a thorough investigation is conducted</em>.
SIDS falls under Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID) which is the unexplained death of a child before investigation and as well as SIDS can include infections and accidental suffocation.
Answer:
12.64%
Explanation:
In this question, we apply the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) formula which is shown below
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
= 4% + 0.87 × 7.4%
= 4% + 6.438%
= 10.438%
The Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return) is also known as the market risk premium and the same is applied.
Now the required rate of return would be
= 10.438% + 2.2%
= 12.64%
Answer:
The answer is: Income statement
Explanation:
As she wants to get information on sales and costs, the Income statement is the statement that she should looking for. With the Balance sheet statement, it only shows information on the financial position reporting the firm's assets, liabilities and owner's equity at a specific point in time rather than the sales and costs firgures during the reporting period.
Furthermore, she should opt for Income statement rather than the common-size income statement because the common-size income statement hardly illustrates any trend during the recent years/ reporting periods, instead, it is only shown each revenue and cost items as percentage of total sales in a specific period.
In the income statement, there should be enough information for the new CFO to find trends on revenues and costs (if any) because the revenue and cost items is detailed enough and at least it should be given the comparision between sales & costs of the reporting period versus the firgures of the previous reporting period.
Answer:
Red Cross took the right decision by reversing the original decision of diverting the donations. If it had diverted the donations donor will loose trust in the organisation and will not come forward to help. When it maintains a policy of honoring donor intent people will trust it to stand by it and they donated for the victims of the terrorist attack and the donations must be spent on it only. Then the trust of the donors will not fall and if the organisation wants donations for other ancillary operation sit can genuinely ask for donations and there are many people who would be willing to help. This gives both trust and respect and also the cause is served. Hence the decision to reverse the original one is correct and a good move.