The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not attach any text or specific reference, so we are going to answer is the following general terms.
One way in which commercial extraction of raw materials in Egypt was different from the commercial extraction of raw materials in the Amazon in the period 1750-1900, was the following.
The commercial extraction of raw materials in Egypt was basically the product of the British colonization efforts in that part of North Africa. Great Britain had several colonies in Africa, one of them being Egypt. More than colonizing the territory to help people to develop and grow, the reality was that the English monarchy just wanted to exploit those raw materials and natural resources. And exploit they did.
In the case of the Amazon forest, European nations such as Portugal did something similar but they instilled the concept of latifundium, wealthy people that owned the land and forced slaves to work, produce, and harvest the crops that were exported to be industrialized.
b.placed heavy restriction on the local population; direct control such as in southern Rhodesia
c. allowed the local population to participate in government; indirect control such as Kenya and Uganda,
d.gave the local population no rights; direct control ; such as in South Africa
e.did not give the local population any position in government; direct control
f.forced th elocal population to adopt new european cultures; direct control
a.offered some rights to the local population;indirect rule
I don’t know if this is write, but maybe to hide the atrocities that went on in the camps from the rest of the world.
<span>D) the desire to find a sea route to Asia before the Portuguese</span>
