I'm sure it's A. The code of Hammurabi because it consisted of ridiculous laws from like 1700 BC.
Answer : Choice
Explanation:
In the U.S. we have freedom which also lead to choice we make our own individual choice
What are the answer choices?
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
In exchange, trade is an arrangement of trade where members in an exchange straightforwardly trade products or administrations for different merchandise or administrations without utilizing a mechanism of trade, for example, cash.
A bargain framework is an old technique for trade. Th is framework has been utilized for a considerable length of time and some time before cash was imagined. Individuals traded administrations and products for different administrations and merchandise consequently.
Today, bargaining has made a rebound utilizing procedures that are progressively advanced to help in exchanging; for example, the Internet. In old occasions, this framework included individuals in a similar territory, anyway today trading is worldwide.
The benefit of bargaining things can be consulted with the other party. Dealing doesn't include cash which is one of the favorable circumstances. You can purchase things by trading a thing you have yet never again need or need. By and large, exchanging this way is done through Online sales and swap markets.
Absolute chaos is what we would define as anarchy; it is essentially the reverse of order. What makes an anarchy worse would be the shocking lack of a robust legal system because there can be no laws in a society built on complete chaos, but if you're talking about a government based on anarchy, it would be a system where there is no state identity and no real central government. Somalia, to some extent, serves as the most prevalent illustration of why a government founded on anarchy is a horrible concept. Although there is a central government, its power over its territory varies. Certain sections are under the influence of the militant group Al Shabab, and the Somaliland region is attempting to declare its independence from the federal government. The country is rife with a milder but no less deadly type of anarchy due to the absence of a strong central leadership.
Anarchic societies where every individual is equally empowered are unsustainable. The individuals quickly cluster into tribal units, and without some overriding authority, it’s impossible to stop that from happening. The tribal units (or gangs, if you prefer) are run by warlords who keep each other in check until one of them gains a decisive advantage over the others, and then you’ve got the beginnings of a state.
This drama has played out countless times in the course of human history, and is still playing out in the criminal underworld to the extent that it can. That extent is limited by the fact that now there is an overriding authority with enforceable power, the legitimate state.
Thank you,
Eddie
