B. (4, 4) is a solution to the equation.
Answer:
im pretty sure the answer would be 40m
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
![x\le \:-2\quad :\quad \begin{bmatrix}\mathrm{Solution:}\:&\:x\le \:-2\:\\ \:\mathrm{Interval\:Notation:}&\:(-\infty \:,\:-2]\end{bmatrix}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%5Cle%20%5C%3A-2%5Cquad%20%3A%5Cquad%20%5Cbegin%7Bbmatrix%7D%5Cmathrm%7BSolution%3A%7D%5C%3A%26%5C%3Ax%5Cle%20%5C%3A-2%5C%3A%5C%5C%20%5C%3A%5Cmathrm%7BInterval%5C%3ANotation%3A%7D%26%5C%3A%28-%5Cinfty%20%5C%3A%2C%5C%3A-2%5D%5Cend%7Bbmatrix%7D)
Please check the attached number line graph.
The number line clearly indicates that the graph is heading towards negative infinity from -2.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the inequality expression
x ≤ -2
The inequality symbol ' ≤ ' means 'less than or equal to'.
Thus,
x ≤ -2 means x is less than or equal to -2.
In other words,
![x\le \:-2\quad :\quad \begin{bmatrix}\mathrm{Solution:}\:&\:x\le \:-2\:\\ \:\mathrm{Interval\:Notation:}&\:(-\infty \:,\:-2]\end{bmatrix}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%5Cle%20%5C%3A-2%5Cquad%20%3A%5Cquad%20%5Cbegin%7Bbmatrix%7D%5Cmathrm%7BSolution%3A%7D%5C%3A%26%5C%3Ax%5Cle%20%5C%3A-2%5C%3A%5C%5C%20%5C%3A%5Cmathrm%7BInterval%5C%3ANotation%3A%7D%26%5C%3A%28-%5Cinfty%20%5C%3A%2C%5C%3A-2%5D%5Cend%7Bbmatrix%7D)
Please check the attached number line graph.
The number line clearly indicates that the graph is heading towards negative infinity from -2.
1/2 = 0.5
Proof:
1/4 + 1/4 = 2/4 = 1/2 = 0.25 + 0.25 = 0.50
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
This equation is in "vertex form," meaning that you can identify the vertex and other features of the graph from the equation.
y = a(x -h)² +k . . . . . the vertex is (h, k); the vertical scale factor is "a"
Comparing to your equation, you see ...
a = -1/2, h = 3, k = -1
The vertex is (h, k) = (3, -1). The vertical scale factor is negative.
__
This tells you the graph opens downward (the scale factor is negative), and the vertex (maximum point) is below the x-axis. (It has a negative y-coordinate.)
Because it start below the x-axis and goes down from there, the graph does not intersect the x-axis. There are zero (0) x-intercepts.