The correct answer is <span>Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña
In this case, the supreme court decided that even in such cases it could be unconstitutional and that each individual case there should be a process of strict scrutiny of the events, which is the most strict way of observing something and the most thorough. The case was related to to both the analysis of the 14th and the 5th amendment.</span>
The formation of blacks' rights, industrialization and new innovations
The only statement about the bill process that is accurate would be that "<span>A bill can have a second chance after a veto," since it can still be passed with a "2/3 majority". </span>
George III
hope this helps :)
