I believe the answer is:
the personal ownership of property
the influence of consumer demand
In command economy, the government has the full control on economy, and the citizens had no ownerships of any type of asset. This give the government with The power to determine price of products even if it's stray away from the flow of consumer demand.
Answer:
Do nothing in regards the Sub-part, since the research does not meet the criteria for prison research: individuals on parole are not considered prisoners. The definition applies to both minors and adults.
Explanation:
They are in a different branch so they need to be able to have their own areas and privacy to do the things they need to do. I hope that helps. I am not positive but its what I read a few weeks ago
Friedrich Hayek was an Austrian Economist known for his work on the <em>Theory of Money</em>, which earned him a Nobel Memorial Prize in 1974. He openly supported classic liberalism, which emphasized the economic freedom of all individuals who formed part of society.
Hayek opposed expansionary spending (or expansionary monetary policy) because he considered, following principles of liberalism, that government intervention in the economy should be kept at its minimum expression. It is up to individuals and the economic relations they form as to whether an economy grows or not. The increase of money supply in a country could bring negative effects such as <em>inflation, </em>which is the sustained increase in the prices of goods and services.
