"All minerals cannot be magnetized." What does this statement most likely represent? A theory or a law?

2 answers:

8 0

This is a theory because this has been proven by scientists years ago. The evidences to prove this theory were shown.
hope this helps!!! :) Pls mark me BRAINLIEST! :)

Anestetic [448]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

THEORY

Explanation:

Naturally, all the minerals cannot be magnetized. In order to get magnetized, the mineral must contain iron oxides in it, that shows the magnetic property and this magnetism occurs due to the motion of electrons in its existing atomic structure. The most common mineral exhibiting magnetism is magnetite, that contains iron oxide in it.

The<u> above given statement is considered to be a theory</u>, because test an experiments were carried out long back, and it has been proved that minerals containing iron can only be magnetized. For example, Magnetite.

You might be interested in

What seven specific processes in the Rock Cycle are necessary to form sedimentary rock?

Elodia [21]

Answer:Sedimentary rocks are the product of 1) weathering of preexisting rocks, 2) transport of the weathering products, 3) deposition of the material, followed by 4) compaction, and 5) cementation of the sediment to form a rock.

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

WRITING FRAME: Elisa’s Diagnosis

Elis [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

Lol

7 0

2 years ago

.In women, aging becomes a significant risk factor for heart disease after the age of:

Gennadij [26K]

Answer: option b - 55

Explanation:

Menopause signifies the time in a woman's life when menstruation ends, usually BETWEEN age 45 - 55.

And because of the crucial role played by Oestrogen in menstruation, its LOSS increases the RISK of HEART DISEASE seen in women AFTER MENOPAUSE .

8 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is an inference?

ozzi

D is the answer because the rest ate observations

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The wild-type color of horned beetles is black, although other colors are known. A black horned beetle from a pure-breeding stra

Kisachek [45]

One hypothesis that explains the result is : A) Two genes are involved with 12:3:1 epistasis, such that A_B_ and A_bb are black, aaB_ is brown,and aabb is green.

Explanation:

This is a case of Dominant Epistasis.
When two genes are involved and presence of dominant allele of one gene masks the effect of either allele of the second gene then the epistasis is termed as dominant epistasis.
In the given case black :brown: green ratio is approximately equal to 12:3:1.
Here presence of a dominant A allele that is responsible for the black colour masks the effect of either allele of B. Therefore A_B_ and A_bb produces black beetles
Again , absence of dominant A allows B to express itself and Brown beetles are produced thus aaB_ is brown.
When both the genes are present as recessive alleles, neither brown nor black colour is expressed and the beetles are green.Thus, aabb are green.

4 0

2 years ago