Answer:
The correct answer is : Personal constructs
Explanation:
This theory says that people employ unique, organized systems of bipolar personal constructs, and sees people as attempting to anticipate their worlds and they use their constructs to make sense of their observations and experiences which is different for everyone.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
In the Schenck v. United States case, the US Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented a clear and present danger to society. Because of that, freedom of speech is not an absolute right, the government could restrict speech if the the words mean a clear and present danger to society.
I do not think so. Our taxes are fair and if we do revolt it would seem like we just did so to anger the government.