Answer:
The evidence is supporting the claim by giving reasoning on why Chicago is good for immigrants
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Answer:
Thomas Paine was a severe critic of the English Constitution. Three components that needed revision, according to him, were:
One, the continuation of the monarchy is the continuation of a tyrannical government; Paines advocate the natural rights of man, all men are born equal and there are no natural rulers. Two, the Peers are a tyrannical, aristocratic institution. Three, for him, there was no real separation of powers in Britain, no real checks and balances.
Explanation:
In Russia, the system of government during the 17th century was absolute monarchy. What this means is that, under this system, a king (or <em>tzar</em>) has complete power to act in any way he sees fit. This means that he is above the law, and that the rest of the government needs to respond to his wishes only.
On the other hand, the system that operated in England was that of a constitutional monarchy. Under this system, no one is above the law. This means that the monarch does not have absolute power because he still has to respect what the law states. Moreover, the government similarly needs to adhere to these laws, and therefore, the king cannot enforce his will, but he has to negotiate and collaborate with the rest of the government.
