The correct answer is: English Debtors!
The colony was established by the governor James Oglethorpe (governor in the years 1732-1743) and he envisioned this colony to be a haven (=safe place) for English debtors and "the worthy poor".
Slavery was prohibited in this colony.
Answer:
The answer is D. Cohort effect.
Explanation:
A cohort is a group of people that share a characteristic, in social research, such characteristic tends to be the birth year or generational designation; in these cases, cohorts might be strongly influenced by the historical and cultural environment of their generation, and this might have an effect on the results of the research project. Cross-sectional method is subject to these effects because they only apply the research techniques in one specific point in time.
Answer:
The use of the term "ethical" sometimes is a bit too lax when applied to evaluate situations. However, sometimes, it can also be too harsh. In response to your two questions, these would be the answers:
1. The ethical question here would be whether Greedy was right in overusing a benefit that the charitable organization had with the First California Bank. As President of the organization, it is in the hands of Greedy to ensure not just development, but also sustainable development of the organization. However, in the course of his attempts to improve the growth and efficacy of Send Me Money, he abused the benefit of the overdraft, and not to just any extent, but to the negative balance of 10.000 dollars. Although his intentions were in favor of the organization, and he used the money wisely, there still lies the question of if he could not have accomplished just as much, without abusing a benefit that could very well mean the end of the organization. So the ethical issue is that although the intention of Greedy was in the benefit of the organization, he did not take the best interest of it into account, because if he had, he would have tried to accomplish his goals without bringing the debt so high.
2. I disapprove of the way that Bill Greedy acted because he could have accomplished much more realistic goals and not placed the organization at risk by raising the debt to a bank to such high levels. Even if he increased fundraising efforts, it is evident that these were not successful, as the debt is so high.
John Smith and Thomas Dale had similar leadership styles because they both made strict rules. Both leaders could be considered tyrants. They both had a no nonsense approach, which made them good leaders for the Jamestown situation because the colony's survival was at stake. These are not necessarily qualities we look for today, because their styles were not democratic. -ally :)
