Hence, option D 4: x=-1.34 is correct
Further explanation:
In order to solve an equation in one varible we have to isolate the variable on one side of the equations
Given equation is:
Hence, option D: x=-1.34 is correct
Keywords: Linear equation in one variable, Solution of equation
Learn more about Linear equations at:
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
(a) Null Hypothesis, :
1.4 pounds
Alternate Hypothesis, :
> 1.4 pounds
(b) If the test statistics is more than the critical value of t at 31 degree of freedom, then we will reject our null hypothesis.
(c) The value of t test statistics is 1.886.
(d) We conclude that the average amount of ham bought is higher at the new store.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that the average number of pounds of sliced ham ordered per customer at the deli where Dennis used to work was 1.4, but at his new job, the average of the 32 people who have ordered ham so far is 1.5 pounds, with a standard deviation of 0.3 pounds.
<em>Let </em><em> = average amount of ham bought at the new store.</em>
So, Null Hypothesis, :
1.4 pounds {means that the average amount of ham bought is lesser than or equal to 1.4 pounds at the new store}
Alternate Hypothesis, :
> 1.4 pounds {means that the average amount of ham bought is higher at the new store}
The test statistics that would be used here <u>One-sample t test statistics</u> as we don't know about the population standard deviation;
T.S. = ~
where, = sample average of ham ordered = 1.5 pounds
s = sample standard deviation = 0.3 pounds
n = sample of people = 32
So, <u><em>test statistics</em></u> = ~
= 1.886
The value of t test statistics is 1.886.
Since, in the question we are not given with the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%. Now, at 5% significance level the t table gives critical value of 1.6955 at 31 degree of freedom for right-tailed test.
<em>Since our test statistics is more than the critical values of t as 1.886 > 1.6955, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which </em><u><em>we reject our null hypothesis</em></u><em>.</em>
Therefore, we conclude that the average amount of ham bought is higher at the new store.