1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dolphi86 [110]
4 years ago
14

Why did it take so long for working class people to fight for improved conditions

History
2 answers:
Otrada [13]4 years ago
5 0
<span>Workers had no voice.  They couldn't convey their voices very well.</span>
alexdok [17]4 years ago
3 0

The answer would be D

Because they had no power to be heard and if they said anything or tried to protest they would be fired and then people who could not find a job would be hired so they just dealt with the hard work and low pay.

Hope that helps people in the future!!

You might be interested in
Why did Congressional radicals welcome Andrew Johnson as president first
Whitepunk [10]
<span>The Republicans decided that their National Union Party was a place for all loyal men so in 1864 they nominated Southerner and Democrat Johnson for Vice President. Johnson already had quite a reputation, during the secession crisis he had remained in the Senate even though Tennessee seceded. This act made him a traitor to the south and a hero to the north. President Lincoln appointed him Military Governor in 1862 over the state of Tennessee and Johnson used that as an opportunity to make that state a laboratory for his reconstruction plans.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Select all that apply.
leonid [27]

Answer:

The following agreements were not part of the Missouri Compromise:

-admit Missouri as a free state

-admit Maine as a slave state

-Congress could not determine the expansion of slavery into the territories

Explanation:

The Missouri Compromise was an agreement taken in 1820 between the representatives of the slave and abolitionist states in the United States Congress in relation to the regulation of slavery in the Western territories, which in the future would become states, to maintain the majority, or at least equality, of the number of states opposed to slavery, existing from the creation of the United States until then.

The compromise arose from the need to maintain the balance that existed between the 11 non-slave states (New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, founders, and Vermont, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois), and the other 11 slave states (Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, founders, and Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Louisiana and Alabama), when discussing in 1819 the law of admission of the new state of Missouri, slave, which would unbalance the composition of the Senate (each state had and has two representatives, regardless of its population), in favor of the slave states. In the House there was no such balance because its representatives were elected proportionally to the population, larger in the northern states.

The negotiated solution that was reached, the following year, on March 2, 1820, consisted in admitting the state of Missouri as a slave state, while creating the state of Maine, (which depended on the state of Massachusetts), as a non-slave state.

Also, and to maintain in the future the balance between states of one type and another, it was agreed to establish a dividing line, defined by the parallel 36º 30 ', as the future limit of the western slavery and abolitionist states.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pennsylvania coal miners went on strike in 1902. How did Thoedore Roosevelt's response illustrate a change in the governments ro
Ratling [72]
Interestingly, the central government ventured in to enable specialists in a work to debate. President Theodore Roosevelt wound up plainly included and set up a reality discovering commission that suspended the strike. The strike never continued, as the mine workers got a 10% wage increment and diminished workdays from ten to nine hours; the proprietors got a higher cost for coal and did not perceive the exchange union as a dealing operator. It was the primary work debate in which the US government mediated as an unbiased authority.
8 0
3 years ago
Who owns the means of production, resources, and businesses in a capitalist economy?
nadezda [96]

The means of production, resources, and businesses in a capitalist economy are based on the private ownership ( as opposed to public ownership). Private ownership is a basic characteristic of Capitalism, together with the notion of market economy, in which the economic decissions are made following the trends of supply and demand.

7 0
4 years ago
True or false : the colonists successfully moved into the Ohio river valley
Natalija [7]

Answer:

true true true true true

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why were the battles in Lexington, Concord, and Cambridge significant? The colonial militia easily defeated the British army. Th
    6·2 answers
  • Please help me someone please will give brainliest!
    15·1 answer
  • Hitler’s invasion of the in____________ June 1941 proved that he would consistently break agreements.
    8·2 answers
  • What is an example of an emotional appeal in "Pack of Lies"?
    7·1 answer
  • Article 2 is about the Legislature. True or False
    6·1 answer
  • (PLEASE HELP)
    9·1 answer
  • During the indutrial revolution , life was relatively____
    14·1 answer
  • How does culture helps to shape your personal identity or sense of self?
    15·1 answer
  • The greatest accomplishment of philip ll of spain was to
    7·2 answers
  • Help plzzzz.....?.?.??..???.?.?.
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!