Because we have to preserve that thing or let it go for something more valuable.
C.it spurred economic development
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
The answer in both statements are true. It is because an interest party is someone who likely stands to gain as this is a type of individual who awaits to gain something or to acquire something. While the disinterested party is no or little stake because he or she doesn't want to be involved or to gain something.
<span>Replication refers to the repetition of a study</span>
