Answer:
The description of the given question is explained throughout the section below.
Explanation:
- The value of the property seems to be under competition from increasing numbers of marketers who'd like to acquire at around that price, the property's amount is increasing, which is defined as resistance.
- Its positions can sometimes be short-lasting if the fresh result of developments that influence the perceptions of such mainstream economy forward towards the commodity.
Answer:
c) $40,000 to buy the part
Explanation:
For computing the better off first we have to compute the per unit cost which is shown below:
= Direct material per unit + Direct labor per unit + variable overhead + applied variable overhead
= $12 + $25 + $13 + $30 × 30%
= $12 + $25 + $13 + $9
= $59
The difference cost would be
= $59 - $55
= $4
Now the better off would be
= Number of units × difference cost
= 10,000 units × $4
= $40,000
Inflation is the situation in which the same amount of money is worth less- meaning that it will have less purchasing power (so one can buy less for 100 dollars now than 10 years ago) - the correct answer is "purchasing power". Lower purchasing power reduces the number of goods that people can afford.
Answer: False
Explanation:
When the government subsidies production of a good, it leads to a rise in the supply of the good. The supply curve shifts down to the right leading to a <em>fall in the price level</em>. But the <em>equilibrium quantity increases</em>.
Thus, the given statement is false that if the government decides to subsidize the production of a good, the result would be a decrease in the equilibrium price and a decrease in the equilibrium quantity.
This is answer could be true I think
