1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dvinal [7]
3 years ago
5

The legislative branch is responsible for which of the following? Select all that apply. establishing taxes on the middle class

debating treaties on the House floor overseeing the Library of Congress and General Accounting Office ratifying treaties repealing unfair laws
History
2 answers:
faltersainse [42]3 years ago
7 0
Ratifying treaties and repealing unfair laws
Anna007 [38]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answers are:

- Ratifying treaties

- Establishing taxes on the middle class

The US Constitution says that the Senate has the power to approve or reject a resolution of ratification of treaties. If the resolution is approved, the ratification takes place. The US Constitution also gives the authority to Congress over financial and budgetary matters, this means that Congress has the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises. The 16th Amendment extended the power of the Congress including the income taxes.

You might be interested in
Which of these was NOT a cause of WW1?
r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer:

Correct answer is 4. The Slavic people revolted against the Serbian government to have their own country

Explanation:

Option four is correct as South Slavs wanted to create a country, in which Serbia would be also included. After the war ended this country was actually created - Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenians.

First option is not correct as all European forces were militarized and nationalized.

Second option is not correct as great alliances, such as Entente and Central Powers were created.

Third option is not correct as Germany first of all wanted more colonies.

5 0
2 years ago
What words did maya angelou say that were inspiring?
Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

i am sure something she said was "Hate, it has caused a lot of problems in the world, but has not solved one yet."

Explanation:

Mark brainliest please but only if you would like to.

Hope this helps!

8 0
2 years ago
Analyze how Douglass uses rhetorical questions to convey his purpose? Cite evidence from the text to support your claim by using
stiv31 [10]
I don’t know because it’s hard dc
4 0
3 years ago
Why did the colonists oppose the taxes imposed after the French and Indian War?
Salsk061 [2.6K]
The answer is B. The colonists felt like they were being taxed without representation. Which is also know at taxation without representation
3 0
3 years ago
Wyzanski argues the principle against ex post facto laws is essential for Rule Of Law (otherwise, it merely becomes Rule of Man)
diamong [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10.  Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.

The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because  the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made".  It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLZ HELP 10000000 POINTS ASAP
    7·1 answer
  • Which people used the potlatch to spread wealth through gift giving
    14·1 answer
  • What’s our 32 president
    12·2 answers
  • Explain the 25 amendment of the Constitution​
    15·1 answer
  • When spain controlled texas, friars raised cattle for food. (true/false)
    15·1 answer
  • During the Great Depression years, the Wagner act was passed which
    14·1 answer
  • Where is the Alamo building located​
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following best explains the impact the necessary and proper clause has had on congressional power?
    7·1 answer
  • 1. Describe the conflict between Sophie and the school authorities. What were the rasons behind Sophie's point of view? Support
    8·1 answer
  • Someone pls help me I will make you Brainly
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!