Answer:
Basic wage rate = $9.375 per hour
Step-by-step explanation:
Given :
Fortnight wage = $750
Basic week, hours worked per week = 40 hours
Weekly basic wage rate :
Fortnight = 2 weeks
Hence, weekly wage = fortnight wage / 2 = 750 /2 = $375
Weekly basic wage rate = $375 / Number of hours worked per week = $375 / 40 = $9.375 per hour
Answer:
The answer would be b.
Step-by-step explanation:
We can easily use process of elimination here. a would not be correct because it's saying that as you move forward, you increase when it's the total opposite. You are decreasing as you move forward.
C and D would not be correct because they both are talking about 0 temperature, and there is no data for that temperature.
So B is the correct answer.
If you liked my answer, please consider giving me a Brainliest! Thank you!
Answer:14
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 10.1246 years (approx)
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, She invests in a CD with an annual interest rate of 6.90% compounded quarterly.
Let the initial amount or principal = P
And, Let after t years it is doubled.
Therefore, data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/462aa/462aa41e5d778134f28da55aa6c516851704ebcd" alt="2P= P(1+\frac{6.9}{400} )^{4t}"
⇒ data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a88ce/a88ce4ffb7d0f4304bc2ea22f952f68c2d846c43" alt="2 = (1+\frac{6.9}{400} )^{4t}"
⇒
( By taking log both sides)
⇒data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bacc8/bacc8253988544ff9c0e3e5e4d567e2df3664fe7" alt="log 2 = t log(1.01725 )^4"
⇒t= log 2/log 1.07080599536= 10.1245504311≈10.1246 years
Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Taking a careful look at the graph above, the graph depicts that there is sizeable growth or increase in the rate of interest between 2008 to 2012. However, the actual increase in the rate of interest between 2008 - 2012 is (3.152% - 3.141%) = 0.011%. This change is very small compared to what is portrayed by the pictorial representation of the bar graph. This could be due to the scaling of the vertical axis which didn't start from 0, thereby exaggerating the increase in the actual rate of interest. It will thus mislead observers into thinking the increase is huge.