The answer is: a newspaper article describing reduced crime rates in cities with teen curfews.
This piece of evidence would best support an argument in favor of a teen curfew because it is based in facts, not opinions, and it shows that other places that have established teen curfews have had positive results because of it. Therefore, there is evidence to asume the possibility that if teen curfew is established in other cities, it would get the same positive results.
An onlilne poll of comunity members and an interview with a parent would serve as evidence when studying how the community feels about teen curfew but not as evidence in an argument in favor of teen curfew because the data would be biased.
Answer: C
Explanation:
A and C are both solid answers depending on the interpretation.
Based on the beginning of the second sentence "product of their various opinions.." I would argue C is the correct answer.
The answer to the following would be A because the convergent currents are large air currents that blow north and south from the equator
Answer:
1. Magnetism
2. im not really sure sorry
3. The water disappeared because of evaporation
4. Evaporation
5. I think Evaporation or distillation
6. Up
1. isolationism - separation, aloneness
2. policy - strategy, guideline
3. national interest - beneficial, useful
4. negotiation - bargaining, make a deal
5. sanctions - penalties, punishment
6. treaty - agreement, deal
