The site of the biggest and bloodiest civil war in georgia was

2 answers:

s2008m [1.1K]3 years ago

8 0

The biggest and bloodiest civil war in georgia was The battle of Chickamauga , the biggest battle ever fought in Georgia, took place on September 18-20, 1863, during the Civil War (1861-65). With 34,000 casualties, it is generally accepted as the second bloodiest engagement of the war; only the Battle of Gettysburg in Pennsylvania, with 51,000 casualties, was deadlier But in georgia it was Chickamauga

The campaign that brought the Union and Confederate armies to Chickamauga began in late June 1863, when the Union Army of the Cumberland under Major General William S. Rosecrans advanced southeastward from Murfreesboro, Tennessee, against the Confederate Army of Tennessee, commanded by General Braxton Bragg. Rosecrans's goal was to capture the city of Chattanooga, Tennessee, an important rail junction and gateway to the Deep South. Through a series of successful and relatively bloodless turning movements, Rosecrans's army forced Bragg's troops to abandon middle Tennessee and fall back to Chattanooga.

dezoksy [38]3 years ago

3 0

Answer: Chickamauga

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Which of the following BEST describes how the Qin dynasty leaders gained control of China?

diamong [38]

Answer:

a they defeated six other Chinese states in battle

Explanation:

Qin Shi Huang began a militarily-driven expansionist policy. In 229 B.C., the Qin seized Zhao territory and continued until they seized all five Zhou states to create a unified Chinese empire in 221 B.C

6 0

2 years ago

Socialism and Communism both hold that the means of production should be owned by which of the following?

astra-53 [7]

I believe the correct answer would be the bourgeois. In Socialist and Communist theory, the bourgeois is the property-owning, or capitalist class.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Per capita GDP of a country is the?

gtnhenbr [62]

The world sorted by their gross domestic product per capita at nominal values. This is the value of all final goods and services produced within a nation in a given year, converted at market exchange rates to current U.S. dollars, divided by the average (or mid-year) population for the same year.

I'm not sure if this is what your lookng for.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the nineteenth century, the popular European view of sub-Saharan Africa was that the area had been uncivilized and was only b

Allushta [10]

Answer:

I do not agree.

Explanation:

The arrival of the British in sub-Saharan Africa is part of European Colonialism, widespread in various parts of the world, with the aim of exploring and dominating a region and all the resources available in it.

It is common to hear that colonization was a blessing for the life of the colonies because it took culture, religion and modenity to a region considered "wild" and "inadequate". However, we can say that colonization was not a blessing anywhere, since in these regions the adoption of European culture and religion was imposed in very violent and authoritarian ways.

All colonies, including sub-Saharan Africa, already had a population established and organized according to their customs and religion. This population was different from what Europeans considered "civilized", but we cannot deny, that the natives had their own type of civilization that functioned efficiently between their citizens and their territory.

However, Europeans considered themselves the owners of the truth, and the only ones endowed with knowledge and education. They totally ignored native civilizations and their cultures, considering them wild and impure, which needed European society to put them in what was right. They used this concept to justify all the violent exploitation and acculturation that the natives went through, because they believed that God had given them the mission to "fix" the peoples and end the civilization that was established in the place, without any consideration.

4 0

3 years ago

The Declaration of Independence was different from previous documents prepared by colonists because it

kramer

Answer: committed to the colonies being independent

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago