Since this is an opinion question you can take it either way.
Pros:
- lower speed may cause lower speed accidents, which are less deadly than their high speed alternatives
- lower speed could potentially allow people to get lost less often because they are able to navigate and respond earlier
<span>- gas savings from optimal operating conditions (between 88.5 - 96.5 km/h [55-60 mph])</span>
Cons:
- longer commute times
- less enjoyable (if you enjoy driving fast)
- may contribute to overall congestion and increase in accidents as people spend more time on average on the roads
Either way, support our opinion and you'll be right.
While our parents were working, Mrs. Kent watched <u>us.</u>
they or we, wouldn't make sense when you read the sentence.
Hope this helps.
<em>Answer: A, "some in the golf world consider him the best player never to have won a major. Though he's come close. Several times.</em>
<em />
Explanation:
The Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917 and 1918 were laws that was passed by the then president of United States of America in an attempt to preserver national image.
<h3>What exactly was the
The Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917 and 1918 supposed to achieve?</h3>
President Woodrow Wilson and the Congress were scared that people would revolt because of the war. Already, Anti-war speeches was on the rise and information decrying the war was being spread using pamphlets.
Hence, The Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917 and 1918 were laws that was passed by the then president of United States of America in an attempt to preserve national image by preventing language that was disloyal, abusive or profane.
Learn more about The Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917 and 1918 at;
brainly.com/question/24170585
#SPJ1
Please add a link or a picture with this problem next time caus