1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ann [662]
3 years ago
6

Why are primary sources important when studying historical events ?

History
2 answers:
emmasim [6.3K]3 years ago
7 0

Primary sources are important when studying historical events, because they generally give eye-witness accounts of what is going on, albeit with opinions. They give historians a view of what a certain group of people think, the actions they take, and how the events affect their everyday lives. Primary sources also allow others to build on top of it, and to give 'parts of the "whole"', such as the pieces of a puzzle, to giving those in the future a more narrow and personal outlook of things.

hope this helps

Ierofanga [76]3 years ago
7 0
The use of primary sources exposes students to important historical concepts. First, students become aware that all written history reflects an author's interpretation of past events. ... Further, as students use primary sources, they develop important analytical skills.
You might be interested in
Which view best summarizes Lincoln's position on slavery in 1858
cestrela7 [59]
The answer is D because I did the question and got it correct
8 0
3 years ago
Which is the closest approximate location for the city of Cairo?
polet [3.4K]

Answer: the answer is 30n, 32e

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Britain's response to the Boston Tea Party was a group of laws which Americans referred to as the Intolerable Acts. One of the l
Sonja [21]
C. they believed going to other colonies or England they could more easily escape any punishment
3 0
4 years ago
• What was characteristic of the conflicts between settlers, the military, and American Indian tribes of the late 1800s and earl
notka56 [123]

Answer:

The characteristic of the conflicts between settlers, the military, and American Indian tribes of the late 1800s and early 1900s is described below in complete details.

Explanation:

Initially, white settlers observed Native Americans as neighborly and favorable. while on the other hand The Native Americans disliked and opposed the settlers' struggles to change them. Their opposition to adapt to European society provoked the settlers and resentment and hatred soon broke out between the two groups.

6 0
3 years ago
While written about the Salem witch trials, miller wrote the crucible to covey his views on
Ksenya-84 [330]
The answer would be A) McCartyism
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which southern colony split into two in 1729
    8·2 answers
  • True or False: Slaves were not an economical long-term investment for West Indies planters.
    7·1 answer
  • Why os the climate closer to the equator warmer than most other places
    13·2 answers
  • Stuff about Greek mythology
    14·1 answer
  • In a few sentences, describe the economic features of Europe, China and Japan. How did they each sustain themselves
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the Freedmen’s Bureau? a. The Freedmen’s Bureau was a federal relief agency that assisted
    12·1 answer
  • Which religion allowed women to preach and
    11·2 answers
  • How did early roads change the U.S economy?
    14·1 answer
  • Henry the Navigator was an explorer before establishing a school of navigation?
    14·1 answer
  • When albert einstein was offered the second presidency of israel, he responded "i know a little about nature and hardly anything
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!