Answer:
Constitutional monarchy.
Explanation:
A Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which monarch– King or Queen, shares power with the Consitutionalized form of government. In such form of government, the King or Queen act as a head of the state, whereas the the Prime Minister act as a head of the government.
The powers of monarchs in the Constitutional monarchy is either limited or ceremonial. Whereas the powers vested to the Prime Minister are excersied accordingly. The examples of such form of government includes UK, Australia, and Belgium.
Therefore, the Constitutional monarchy is the correct answer.
The House of Representatives is a 435-member body that meets in the south end of the Capitol building. Its members are chosen from districts apportioned by population - so, for example, California has many more Members than South Dakota, since the former has so many more residents - and are elected every two years. The Constitution specifically provides that the House has the sole power of impeachment, or of legal removal from office of federal officials that have committed "high crimes and misdemeanors," and also directs that any bills that raise revenue must originate in the House.
The Senate, on the other hand, is a 100-member body that meets in the north end of the Capitol building. Each state has two Senators, no matter how large or small the state might be, and Senators are elected for six-year terms. The Constitution directs that the Senate shall conduct impeachment trials, and that it should provide "advice and consent" to Presidential appointments and on treaties. The Senate is designed to be a bit more removed from the popular will than the House, to be, as Washington reportedly put it, the "cooling saucer" to the House's hot teacup.
Prior restraint is censorship imposed, usually by a government or institution, on expression, that ... These injunctions are considered prior restraint because potential future publications .... The first notable case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled on a prior .... In the Pentagon Papers case (New York Times
President Roosevelt was the 32nd president of the US, and describe this battle as a turning point because the Soviets had successfully stopped the German invasion.
<h3>What is the turning point of the battle?</h3>
A turning point in this discourse is an event that happened during the battle, after which some modern scholars would match that the ultimate outcome was fateful.
Roosevelt self-addressed Congress and inquire for a testimony of war against Japan. Afterward, Germany announced war on the US.
This American victory to play Japan in the Conflict of Midway was the turning point of the war in the Peaceable. It tagged the happening of the extremity of Japan's power of the Pacific Ocean.
Therefore, option B is correct.
To learn more about the turning point of the battle, refer to:
brainly.com/question/680418
