Answer:
The translation would be confirmed because all of the inscriptions meant the same thing.
Explanation:
The answer is technically in the passage; the text says, "the priests' statement could be read by Egyptians who understood Greek, as well as by those who knew only one or both of the Egyptian languages." Because the inscriptions meant the exact same thing, the statements could be read by multiple people, and the translation would be confirmed.
I hope you kind of understand what I meant...good luck on your assignment and have a wonderful day :3
Answer:
I think the correct choice is the first one
Explanation:
The ending is effective because it gives the reader the choice. It sparks conversation and forces the reader or group to analyze and really think about the story so they can decide how it ends.
The correct answer is C: Logos.
In this passage, Wiesel gives a specific example of the cost of indifference. Specifically, thanks to the indifference of the United States, 1000 lives were needlessly lost when a ship was sent back to Nazi Germany.
Answer A can be eliminated because no question is being asked in the passage. Answer B can be eliminated because the exact number killed is mentioned but is not the focus of the passage. Finally, Answer D can be eliminated because he is not retelling a sad story about death.
The main idea of the passage is that the indifference of the US resulted in the deaths of those aboard the St. Louis.
D.Comparison and Contrast
