Answer: Was crowned pope on Christmas Day, A.D. 800 / united a vast realm under the Christian faith.
Explanation:
Some historians consider Charlemagne to be one of the most significant figures of medieval Europe. Due to his military and political influences, he became the most influential figure in Western Europe. In so doing, the term "Christian Empire" he uses has become synonymous with the entire Christian West, in opposition to the Byzantine Empire. By his coronation, Charlemagne became the patron saint of the whole Christian West and the papacy. Its impact is enormous in all fields of life. His inauguration was boycotted by Byzantium, leading to war. The war ended in Aachen in 812, and Byzantium thus had to acknowledge Charles's imperial rule.
A linguist studies language in a scientific way; so not just a certain language like Spanish, Mandarin or such, but how a language is written, communicated, it's forms, etc.
ANSWER: Prithviraj Chauhan was a Rajput Indian king of the Chauhan dynasty who ruled from 1178 to 1192 CE. He was a ruler of the present day states of Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana and Delhi of India. He achieved various military successes against several Hindu kingdoms. He also defeated Muhammad of Ghori who was a ruler of Islamic Ghurid Dynasty. The Muhammad of Ghori reverted back with an attack in 1192 CE with the second battle of Tarain where Prithviraj Chauhan was defeated and it laid the foundation of Islamic conquest in India.
Answer:
Mayan Government.
Explanation:
The Mayans developed a hierarchical government ruled by kings and priests. They lived in independent city-states consisting of rural communities and large urban ceremonial centers. There were no standing armies, but warfare played an important role in religion, power and prestige.
Answer:
<h2>be completely powerful</h2>
<u>Further details:</u>
Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes' view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.
Probably the most famous set of lines from Hobbes' <em>Leviathan</em> book describes what he saw as the natural state of human affairs without government -- one in which every individual had freedom, but that meant it was a situation of "war of all against all," or we might say, every man for himself. Hobbes wrote:
- <em>In such condition, there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.</em>
