Answer:
The company’s return on common stockholders’ equity for the present year is 7.9%
Explanation:
The return on common stockholders’ equity of the company for the present year is computed as:
= Net Income - (Shares x 6% x Rate of shares)
where
Net Income is $171,000
Shares is 10,000
Rate is $100
Putting the values in the above:
=$171,000 - (10,000 x .06 x $100)
= $171,000 - $60,000
= $111,000
Return on common stockholders’ equity = [ $111,000 / Common stockholders’ equity on January 1 + Common stockholders’ equity on December 31 / 2 )]
= ([$111,000($1,200,000+$1,600,000 /2 )]
= $111,000 / ($28,00,000 / 2)
= $111,000 / $14,00,000
= 0.079 or 7.9%
Yes. because turning it on mainly is too hard for exp. your shower turns from hot 2 cold
Answer: Paul has a taxable dividend of $15,000.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that ABC Corporation has E & P of $240,000 and distributes land with a fair market value of $70,000 (adjusted basis of $25,000) to its sole shareholder, Paul. We are further informed that the land is subject to a liability of $55,000.
The taxable dividend will be the difference between the fair market value of land and the liability on the land. This will be:
= $70,000 - $55,000
= $15,000
Therefore, Paul has a taxable dividend of $15,000.
Answer:
It does not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to evaluate if a particular transaction carried out between a customer and an inn falls within the dictates of the local consumer protection law in the state.
Firstly, we look at what the local consumer protection law of the state talks about. It explicitly stated that customers should get receipts when suppliers receive deposits from them. Thus, this make the receipt act as the first thing to have if there would be any claim under the consumer protection law for the transaction carried out in the state.
Now, looking at the particular scenario we have, the customer paid for the room, but he was not issued a receipt. This makes the case not treatable within the consumer protection law of the state as the receipt which should have been a prerequisite for further exploration is not available
The one that you could do to adress this is to Establish a system that provides each sales team member with specific, challenging sales goals and performance<span> feedback from their store manager.
By doing this, not only we put a focus for each team members on the expectation toward them, we also could use the data collected by each determines to determine if there is someone that needed to be let go.</span>
