Answer:
d. beta did a better job of explaining the returns than standard deviation
Explanation:
Beta measures the systemic risk associated with the particular investment, it do not compute the total risk associated, which is more logical.
Standard deviation computes the total risk associated.
Some risk is natural, like the risk of floods, natural calamities, earthquake, etc:
That risk shall not counted as for comparison as that is associated universally. Further, the risk associated with particular factors like bankruptcy of a company, or some legal case issue of a company are precisely described by beta coefficient.
Thus, beta provides better details about explaining the returns.
Answer:
I believe this would be D
Explanation:
I say that it is D because it is asking about what they would do under certain circumstances and or situations to see what they would say
<span>The method by which a message is conveyed between people is called a discussion or a dialogue. The idea here is to allow a certain communication among participants in a back and forth manner.</span>
The correct answer is Overconfidence bias
Explanation:
Overconfidence bias is the result of an excessive and unrealistic estimation of one's skills, knowledge, ideas, etc even to the point the individual considers himself better than others or does not have an objective perception about himself. This type of bias can lead to negative consequences, for example, by overestimating his ability to pass a test a student might choose not to study at all and then fail the test. Moreover, this can be avoided by assessing realistically one's skills, judgments, etc. According to this, the type of bias that can be avoided is overconfidence bias.
Premium is like a better version of something else