Confrontation most times, makes situations worse. You're with your partner to understand them. If they do something you don't like or something wrong, you don't just go straight up and confront them. No. You sit with them and talk about it first.
Confrontation is not totally outruled in positive/healthy relationships, though. It mostly comes in handy when you've discussed particular issues with your partner (usually something they're doing wrong) and they keep doing them. In this case, you feel your partner has no regard or respect for you or your opinions, neither do they value the peaceful approach you must have taken towards resolving whatever issues.
Nevertheless, confrontation, with or without a peaceful approach first, usually never has a positive outcome. Your partner might feel that by confronting them, you're challenging or even disrespecting them. So, it's best to try to avoid to avoid any form of confrontation towards your partner. And if you feel like, despite trying to take a peaceful approach towards a not-too-good situation, they still continue to do what they are doing, then it's up to you to decide whether or not you want to continue with them.
Hope this helps.
<h2>Political science </h2>
It is a social psychology which administers with arrangements of governance, and the interpretation of federal movements, governmental decisions, and legislative actions. It traffics extensively with the principles and application of diplomacies which is usually thought of as ascertaining of the concentration on powers and sources.
Answer:
<em>Goods were produced efficiently and needed more efficient transportation.</em>
Explanation:
The transport evolved mainly during the Industrial Revolution because the industry began to produce much and with great efficiency, which generated the need for improvements in the automobiles of the time, so that the transportation of the goods produced did not damage the quality. Initially, most of these improvements were restricted to England and the 2nd Industrial Revolution (1850-1900), conquered other countries in Europe, America and Asia. Including maritime and land transport, with the creation of ships and locomotive.
Hope this helps..
Answer:
The misfortunes in the Middle East were faltering: the war not just attacked the land and pulverized armed forces, it decimated entire social orders and economies. Thusly, the experience of World War I in the Middle East is maybe more likened to the experience of World War II in Europe.Nov 16, 2015
Explanation:
The misfortunes in the Middle East were faltering: the war not just attacked the land and pulverized armed forces, it decimated entire social orders and economies. Thusly, the experience of World War I in the Middle East is maybe more likened to the experience of World War II in Europe.Nov 16, 2015
The correct answer is Royal authority.
Mercy Otis Warren attacked Royalty authority in her poems and plays.
