Answer:
C. structuralism
Explanation:
Structuralism: In psychology, the term "structuralism" is also referred to as "structural psychology" and was introduced by one of the famous psychologists named Wilhelm Wundt and later on examined and elaborated by one of his students named Edward Bradford Titchener.
The theory of structuralism is based on consciousness and psychologists uses and implements introspection, emotions, self-reports of sensations, feelings, views, etc. It tends to uncover various things that an individual do include feels, think, perceive, etc.
Answer:
Invasion of privacy.
Explanation:
A tort in Civil law is wrong doing by a person against another person, that can lead to the wrong-doer being held legally liable for his or her actions.
The tort of "Invasion of privacy" occurs when the actions of a person or organization intrudes into someone's personal life without permission.
Appropriation is a form of invasion of privacy, where a person or organization, without permission, uses another person's picture, name or likeness to make commercial gains.
When this happens, the party responsible is liable to pay damages to the wronged individual.
The difference that human resource has from land and capital is that it has to do with the physical effort that humans bring in the production of goods and services.
<h3>What is human resources?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the skills and the knowledge that humans have to bring into the production process. This is the physical skill that people have that allows for the production of goods and services during production,.
An example of this is labor. This is one of the factors of production. Hence we can say that human resource is different because it is the skills that people have.
Read more on human resources here: brainly.com/question/10583893
#SPJ1
“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
on farms in the western frontier. In rural of the South.
