Seems to me that the second option looks as if it were correct. While paraphrasing and summarizing, you are trying to shorten up an original piece of writing. Giving a well developed descriptions of main ideas isn't something to look for in paraphrasing, so that's why the first option is incorrect. In addition, restating basically everything from a text is not called paraphrasing nor summarizing, and that is why I'd rather classify it as copying.
.Answer:
<em>Direct object</em>
Explanation:
A gerund phrase (<em>scrubbing with stain remover</em>) is a type of phrase where the main word is a gerund (verb root + -ing). Gerund phrase always serves as a noun and that noun can have the function of a subject, indirect or direct object, predicate nominatives or object of a preposition.
In the given sentence the gerund phrase functions as a direct object where the noun (in this case gerund phrase - <em>scrubbing with stain remover</em>) is receiving the action of the verb<em> tried.</em>
Answer:
"American Draft Dodger in Thunder Bay" has allusions to Mississippi and Vietnam.
Explanation:
Allusion is a figure of speech that allows a text to make references and cite other texts, places, people and works. While reading "American Draft Dodger in Thunder Bay" we can see allusions to places, like Mississippi and Vietnam, mainly on the lines:
"And he was given every reason to stay Hallelujah, Mississippi"
"Till Vietnam moved next door"
"I got nothing against them Viet Cong"
Answer:
Through struggle we discover who we are and what we were born to do.
Explanation:
is something like this what u wanted?
