Needs: food, shelter, clothing, water, sleep.
Wants: Phone, pets, house decor, cookware, pictures.
And then, I'm not sure what your family does for the first question.
Answer: they hurt the president because they dont like that president
Explanation: so for example if you were a president and no body likes they will hurt yout=right
Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.
Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.
Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal, regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.
Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract, out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.
In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.
Answer: Would have led to more loss of life.
Explanation:
President Truman believed that dropping the atomic bombs saved both American and Japanese lives because a battle on mainland Japan would have been devastating.
He is supported in this stance by the fierce resistance of the Japanese on islands closer to the mainland such as Okinawa. With over a million more Japanese soldiers waiting on the mainland as well as thousands of Kamikaze pilots, resistance on the Japanese mainland was going to be very brutal and would potentially have cost millions of lives, both civilian and military.
Truman therefore believed that dropping the atomic bombs would cause the Japanese to surrender and save both nations the massive loss of life.
Answer:
A historian can study ancient Roman culture to learn about attitudes of Roman toward slavery and violence.
Explanation:
The historian has a difficult time understanding how any person would enjoy, or even tolerate, watching such a thing where slaves were forced to fight to the death with other people and even wild animals just for spectators' entertainment.
To better understand the Colosseum, a historian can study ancient Roman culture to learn about the attitudes of Roman toward slavery and violence.