1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kolbaska11 [484]
3 years ago
11

For whom was the battle of New York City a victory? the Americans the British

History
2 answers:
Sergio039 [100]3 years ago
4 0
B.) For "Britishers" <span>battle of New York City was a victory

Hope this helps!</span>
son4ous [18]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Battle of New York was a victory for the British.

Explanation:

With the British landing on Staten Island on July 3, 1776, the British gained control of New York City and surrounding areas.

The early campaign was a significant strategic and tactical success for the British and a clear defeat for the Continental Army. The British naval forces, led by Admiral Lord Richard Howe, and the British Army, led by his brother General William Howe, took control of New York City, its port and surrounding agricultural areas. They came to hold the town and Long Island for seven years until 1783.

You might be interested in
Among the forms of Consequentialism, which one do you most believe in? Why?
DedPeter [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or (c) to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism. Although those three views disagree about which kinds of consequences matter, they agree that consequences are all that matters. So, they agree that consequentialism is true. The utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham is a well known example of consequentialism. By contrast, the deontological theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are nonconsequentialist.

Consequentialism is controversial. Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one’s duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one’s own heart, actualizing one’s own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others—no matter the consequences.

This article describes different versions of consequentialism. It also sketches several of the most popular reasons to believe consequentialism, along with objections to those reasons, and several of the most popular reasons to disbelieve it, along with objections to those reasons.

4 0
3 years ago
How did most african countries gain their independence
Dimas [21]

Answer:

Sorry I don't know if this will help you or not.

Explanation:

This led to the independence of the Union of South Africa in 1931 through negatiations with the British empire and Libya in 1951 from Italy; followed by others in the late 1950s. The road to African independence was very hard and tortuous often through bloody fights, revolts and assasinations.

3 0
2 years ago
GIVING BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP!!
MArishka [77]

Explanation:

A and C.

like 90% confident on this one.

4 0
3 years ago
What are two affects on the navigation acts
Gemiola [76]

Answer: The Navigation Acts, while enriching Britain, caused resentment in the colonies and contributed to the American Revolution. The Navigation Acts required all of a colony's imports to be either bought from Britain or resold by British merchants in Britain, regardless of the price obtainable elsewhere.

3 0
3 years ago
What allowed the dutch to become active in the west african trade in the mid-sixteenth century?
Rina8888 [55]

One thing that allowed the Dutch to become active in the West African Trade in the mid-sixteenth century was the colonization of the Americas.

<h3 /><h3>What was the effect of the colonization of the Americas on Dutch Trade?</h3>

As a result of the colonization of the Americas, the sugar industry was able to grow thanks to the sugar plantations in places like Brazil and Haiti which fed a very demanding population in Europe.

The Dutch then used this as an opportunity to get involved in the trade of enslaved people from West Africa. These enslaved people would be used on the profitable sugar plantations and would go through living hell.

Find out more on the effects of sugar on slavery at brainly.com/question/10851295

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • The Espionage Act (1917) and Sedition Act (1918) were both
    15·2 answers
  • What role can the dissemination of news play in the development of political revolutions ?
    15·1 answer
  • What was life like for most people?
    7·2 answers
  • What role did geography play in the growth of three distinct cultural religions in the English colonies?
    6·1 answer
  • what is one way in european politics changed because of expansion and global trade during the 15th to 18th centuries
    8·1 answer
  • Whats the biggest difference between a empire and republic?
    9·2 answers
  • The first contribution of the United States to the war was:
    14·2 answers
  • Someone please try to help me number 8
    7·1 answer
  • Indian Mahfils &amp; Classics <br> Please help!!!
    15·1 answer
  • Which religions were practiced in the mughal empire
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!