The United States invaded Iraq in 2003 because
Iraq had WMDs and Iraq had previously supported terrorist organizations. Hence, options A and B.
<h3>Reasons for the invasion of Iraq in 2003</h3>
The following are the reasons for the invasion;
- Bush believed Saddam and Iraq had WMDs.
- Bush argued that Iraq had previously supported terrorist organizations.
Therefore, the options A and B are the reasons behind the United States invading Iraq in 2003.
learn more about Invasion of Iraq: brainly.com/question/718564
#SPJ1
Answer:
rice, maize, oilseed, jute
Explanation:
I hope this helps! Lmk if its wrong:)
Benito Mussolini is the person in the picture
Answer:
Terrain, climate, soil properties, and soil water.
Explanation:
Environmental factors such as terrain, climate, soil properties, and soil water are the factors that determine a specific crop could be transplanted into a new region because the crop needs these factors for better growth and development. Climate is the major factor because different plants needs different type of climate so the crop fits only in that climate at which they have tolerance. If a plant have more water requirement does not survive in desert or arid climate.
Answer:
Let us assume that Jimmy Carter is an intelligent, decent, hardworking man. Assume, moreover, that he has appointed to his cabinet and sub-cabinet many men and women who are experienced and dedicated. How, then, can a president—certainly no less mentally alert than most past presidents—with many advisers of high caliber, produce such an undistinguished presidency?
It’s a puzzlement. And it cannot be accounted for by most of the explanations currently in vogue, such as: Carter’s an outsider who really doesn’t understand the levers of national governance; or Carter surrounds himself with a “Georgia Mafia” whose weaknesses are the same as his own; or Carter is a bad manager who hasn’t been able to sort out decisions that a president must make from those that should be settled at lower levels; or Congress is so uncontrollable that it will not allow any president to exercise the reins of leadership; or the bureaucracy has grown beyond the span of presidential control; or many of the nation’s problem’s are highly intractable; or even all these reasons taken together—although there is truth in all.
I would like to put forward another theory: The root of the problem is that Jimmy Carter is the first Process President in American history.
“Process President”—using a definition by Aaron Wildavsky and Jack Knott—means that Carter places “greater emphasis on methods, procedures and instruments for making policy than on the content of policy itself.”
Carter is an activist. He wants to do things. Yet his campaign statements should have warned us that save for the human rights thrust in foreign policy, his passion in government is for how things are done, rather than what should be done.
He believes that if the process is good the product will be good. In other words, if he sets up a procedure for making policy that is open, comprehensive (his favorite word), and involves good people, whatever comes out of this pipeline will be acceptable (within certain budgetary limits).
Explanation: