1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kryger [21]
3 years ago
11

Select the reasons that the Dutch sent families to settle in America

History
1 answer:
Sever21 [200]3 years ago
6 0
<span>Most Dutch came to America simply because they calculated that the future promised more prosperity for them and their children in America than in Holland. The Dutch were ever "family, faith, and farming" advocates. And the Dutch — as opposed to the Puritans — enjoyed the materialistic and creature comforts in life that their hard-earned money bought.</span>
You might be interested in
What was FRANCISCO VAZQUEZ DE CORONADO Significant?
aleksklad [387]
If you looked at google, it would day Francisco was a Spanish conquistador and explorer who led a large expedition from mexico to present day kanas through parts of the southwestern united states between 1540 and 1542
4 0
3 years ago
Which judicial power does the constitution give to congress answers?
Kipish [7]
A law that violates the Constitution must be overturned. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read each statement and decide whether it applies to Ellis Island, Angel Island, or both.
Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

1) Immigrants were usually processed in just a few hours.                                 2)Most immigrants were from China and other Asian nations.

3)Immigrants had to pass health inspections before being admitted to the United States.

4)Immigrants could be denied entry or sent back to their home countries.

Explanation:

1-Ellis

2-Angel

3-Both

4-Both

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Someone please help!
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer: Yes because the are part of the law and if they think that is okay then thats okay is long as people have there lisence but they also have to make it a law and the president has to exept it

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
How were Simon bolivar and Jose de San Martin similar
Butoxors [25]

José de San Martín vs. Simón Bolívar

José de San Martín, 1778-1850, and Simon Bolívar, 1783-1830, were two of the primary causes of independence of countries from colonial powers in Latin America. Simon Bolívar is primarily known for liberating Venezuela, and he is called the Liberator of the North. José de San Martín, known as the Liberator of the South, is primarily known for freeing Argentina. Both men are well-known and lived during about the same time period and even met each other. However, their areas of liberation, methods of liberation and motives were very different from each other.

Bolívar and Martín differed in areas of jurisdiction – Venezuela and Argentina, respectively, as well as methods and means of revolution. Bolívar was 26 years old when Venezuela declared its independence in 1811, and under the revolutionary leader he brought back Francisco de Miranda, who had long advocated freedom from the Spanish rule Venezuela was once under, to become Venezuela’s leader. However, after an erratic and unsuccessful leadership, Bolívar captured Miranda (after his rebel army was stopped) and betrayed him by turning over to the Spanish, but the Spanish only sent Bolívar into exile (unlike Miranda, who they imprisoned). After returning from exile, Bolívar taught creoles that they could rebel successfully against 3 decades of Spanish rule, but was then drove out by the Spaniards. After being chased out of Venezuela three more times, while using terror tactics the Spanish had once used against Creoles such as suffocation, while gaining the support of the British and a bond with Haiti, and while declaring that he would abolish slavery as his first official act (if in power), he decided to build a guerilla warfare army in 1817. After defeating the Spanish in New Granada (which consisted of present-day Columbia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Panama) using guerilla tactics and the help of thousands of mercenaries from Britain and Germany, he met with San Martín and desired to take advantage of Spain’s falling empire (due to political disagreements and an army revolt), but did not collaborate with him on a major scale. Bolívar formed a series of nations called “Grand Columbia” out of New Granada from which he intended to make a “model of strength and aggression from outside and of cooperation inside”, however, this unification soon disbanded itself (Adams, 33). Bolívar’s last battle ended in splendor in 1823, as it was entirely between cavalry with swords and lances.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was not a factor that helped bring about the Reformation?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following could hinder a study of classical music?
    12·2 answers
  • How did western imperialism impact culture worldwide?
    13·1 answer
  • Scientific evidence suggests all geologic processes have been the same throughout earth's history.
    11·1 answer
  • Which individual played a critical role in the founding of Texas by leading the Texas military forces and winning at the battle
    15·1 answer
  • At what point did the majority of
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!! I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
    14·2 answers
  • Describe some of the causes that led to the fall of the Roman Empire.
    6·1 answer
  • What are some thing you see in this image?​
    15·1 answer
  • Help meeeeee pretty please
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!