Answer:
- Did not take responsibility for his speech.
Explanation:
As per the given description, the response given by Daniel to defend the structural organization of his speech reflect that he 'did not take the responsibility for his speech' which may affect his credibility as the speaker and lessen the impact of the speech. In order to be an efficient speaker, it is always advised that no matter what content one presents, he/she is supposed to take the sole responsibility of it which not only reflects your confidence and skills(in your research) but also helps enhance his reliability(as a speaker) as well as his claim and persuade the audience more conveniently. Thus, it reflects that 'he didn't take responsibility for his speech'.
Contact with native populations is rarely an even exchange, natives are always exploited in some way.
Answer:
i hope this helps
Explanation:
Shakespeare himself can be understood as the ultimate product of Renaissance humanism; he was an artist with a deep understanding of humanity and an uncanny ability for self-expression who openly practiced and celebrated the ideals of intellectual freedom.
4. hints more at the subject going to many future places "everywhere you may go" - he is expected to go "everywhere". 5. is more of an open, 'nobody knows where you'll go' kind of sentence, 6. is quite alike to 5. If you have to pick one for fluency, I think that 5 flows the best.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
You would put the apostrophe after the word it and substitute the letter "i" with it in the word "is"
