Answer:
1/14
Step-by-step explanation:
2/7 ÷ 4
=2/7 x 1/4
=2/28
=1/14
Answer:
huh
Step-by-step explanation:
there is no attachment my guy
The sum clearly diverges. This is indisputable. The point of the claim above, that

is to demonstrate that a sum of infinitely many terms can be manipulated in a variety of ways to end up with a contradictory result. It's an artifact of trying to do computations with an infinite number of terms.
The mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan famously demonstrated the above as follows: Suppose the series converges to some constant, call it

. Then

Now, recall the geometric power series

which holds for any

. It has derivative

Taking

, we end up with

and so

But as mentioned above, neither power series converges unless

. What Ramanujan did was to consider the sum

as a limit of the power series evaluated at

:

then arrived at the conclusion that

.
But again, let's emphasize that this result is patently wrong, and only serves to demonstrate that one can't manipulate a sum of infinitely many terms like one would a sum of a finite number of terms.
Answer:
5(x^2 + 5)
Step-by-step explanation:
The binomial 5х^2 + 25 has the factor 5 in each term. Thus, in factored form, 5х^2+ 25 = 5(x^2 + 5).
Answer:
Step-50*t + 30*m = 1500, (1) (pounds)
4*t + 3*m = 138. (2) (cubic feet)
From (2), express 3m = 138 - 4t, and substitute it into (1). You will get
50t + 10*(138-4t) = 1500, or
10t = 1500 - 1380 ---> 10t = 1120 ---> t = 112 TVs.
From this point, find the number of microwaves on your own.
step by-step explanation: