Answer:
d. pollution should be eliminated as long as the benefit from a cleanup exceeds the opportunity cost.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is defined as the forgone cost of doing a particular activity. If you were not undertaking this activity what would you have gained by doing something else?
In this case as long as the benefit from cleaning up the pollution is greater than the opportunity cost (pollution) it should be undertaken.
Answer:
John should include $1,600 as rental income on his Year 4 tax return as a result of the $2,000 payment.
Explanation:
As a cash-basis taxpayer, John's taxable income is based on the actual cash receipts and payments made in the accounting period. The refundable part of the rent should not be included as rental income since it is a security deposit that would be returned at the end of the lease period. If John were an accrual-basis taxpayer, the rental income to be included would have been only $800 representing income for Year 4.
Answer:
Therefore I can borrow $19646.12 from E-Loan.
The interest I will pay for the loan is $1,857.88.
Explanation:
The formula of present value is
PMT = The monthly payment = $448
i= Rate of interest per period 
n = The number of month = 48 months
Therefore
≈$19646.12
Therefore I can borrow $19646.12 from E-Loan.
The interest = Paid amount - Loan amount
=$[(448×48)-19646.12]
=$1,857.88
The interest I will pay for the loan is $1,857.88.
Answer:
$3,122.96
Explanation:
Future value = 5000
i = 8%
n = 6
m = 2
Present Value = FV(1+i/m)^mn
Present Value = 5,000(1+0.08/2)^-2*6
Present Value = 5,000(1.04)^-12
Present Value = 5,000 / (1.04)^12
Present Value = 5,000 / 1.6010322
Present Value = 3122.985284118583
Present Value = $3,122.96
Answer:
- <u><em>D. It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
Of course, ethics mandates that the target of science and <em>new technology </em>should always pursue the good for humans; nevertheless, since time immemorial man has developed technology to make war. Thus, definetely, the first statement <em>"A It always does good for human"</em> is false.
Some other negative effects of <em>new technology</em>, like cars and nuclear power, have been harmful to the environment, but you cannot tell that this has always been so. Technology has also been developed to help the environment. For instance, panels to use solar energy do not harm the environment and seek to reduce fuel burning to help the environment. Thus, option <em>B, "It always ends up doing harm to the environment"</em> is false too.
Some of the damage that new technology can produce are not predicted both because the technology is new and because it may be used with different goals to those it was developed. This explains why option <em>C, It has many bad effects</em>, is false, and option <em>D, "It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are", </em>is true.
