1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WITCHER [35]
3 years ago
14

1. What is the first step historians take as part of the historical thinking process?

History
1 answer:
nika2105 [10]3 years ago
7 0
The first step historians take as part of the historical thinking process is to pose the historical question and establish relevant background about the topic. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help. 


You might be interested in
Which of the following was true for Serfs living in Medieval times? Select all that apply
Ludmilka [50]

Answer:

they were free people

they did not own property

their position in society was inherited by birth

7 0
3 years ago
How were many americans exposed to the ideas of the federalists?
Charra [1.4K]
<span>Many Americans were exposed to the ideas of the federalists by the "Federalist Papers". These papers, which consisted of a set of articles, were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, although they originally didn't publish these articles under there own name. The articles were published in journals across New York. The articles were later bundled and were called the "Federalist Papers".</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Amendment 10 of the Constitution specifically states, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor pr
FromTheMoon [43]

Correct answer:

<h2>Limited government</h2>

The 10th Amendment puts limits on the powers of the federal government.  It reserves powers for the states (and for the people themselves) any powers not specifically designated to the federal government in the United States Constitution.   Any laws and powers exercised by the states still must be in accord with what is stated in the US Constitution, however.

For some historical context, we might also consider that the original framers of the US Constitution thoughts that statements such as the 10th Amendment -- and all of the first 10 Amendments, known as the Bill of Rights -- were already inherent in the Constitution as it was written.  They had composed a constitution that intentionally placed limits on the federal government. So, stating such a limit in an amendment seemed like a repetition of what was already apparent in the Constitution itself.  As noted by the National Constitution Center, "The Constitution’s Framers thought that a bill of rights was appropriate for an unlimited government, but not for a limited one like the national government created by the Constitution. The Constitution accordingly sought to secure liberty through enumerations of powers to the government rather than through enumerations of rights to the people."

Nevertheless, to assure those who wanted the rights of the people specifically listed and protected, Amendments 1 through 10 were added to the Constitution as a Bill of Rights to affirm those protections.

8 0
3 years ago
What is mistletoe? Explain
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

Mistletoe is a plant that grows on range of trees including willow, apple and oak trees. The tradition of hanging it in the house goes back to the times of the ancient Druids. It is supposed to possess mystical powers which bring good luck to the household and wards off evil spirits.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the similarities and differences in foreign policy during the Eisenhower and Kennedy Administrations.
Anna71 [15]

this is what i found if this not help im sorry and i qote

"The purpose of this study is to assess the ways in which President Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy reacted to the civil rights crises in Little Rock in 1957 and at Ole Miss in 1962. A side theme is to assess presidential learning by seeing whet Kennedy learned from the lessons taught by Eisenhower. Each president was reluctant to commit federal troops to enforcing civil rights, was concerned about the problems associated with federalism, and ended up feeling forced to commit troops nonetheless. The message is that despite the presidents' best intentions, troops ultimately had to be committed. Kennedy was unable to avoid the traps that Eisenhower had encountered, and the imposition of the national government on the enforcement of civil rights was firmly established. "


6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the United States want to “isolate” itself from Europe after WWI?
    5·1 answer
  • the ____ people of the indus river valley left a significant amount of literature yet no architectural artifacts and they based
    15·2 answers
  • Is it possible for smart phones to be hacked to cyber bully private U.S. citizens by hackers and government employees, and how w
    9·1 answer
  • What does rNA stand for
    11·1 answer
  • Which detail about king james ii made him unpopular in england?
    15·1 answer
  • Who controlled south korea following world war 2
    6·1 answer
  • How did the land act of 1820 change regulations regarding western settlement?
    5·2 answers
  • 16.   What two colonies were established to follow strict Puritan beliefs only? 
    12·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST The US Congress voted to pass the _______, which made Washington territory a state.
    9·2 answers
  • Did taiwan sign the comprehensive test ban treaty?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!