The Civil War was by far the most catastrophic event to ever happen in the American South. There have been at least a few discussions on whether Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans should have prosecuted the Civil War, but surprisingly very little analysis on whether South Carolina's secession in 1860 was a strategically wise move in the context of the American debate on slavery and states' rights.
Secession was driven by the Southern planter class. For the purposes of this article, let's stipulate that the preservation of slavery and the plantation economy was the primary objective in seceding from the United States. If that was the point of secession, then the strategy was an obvious disaster
A: Focusing on one source of information
The correct answer is c) the government is specifically forbidden from searching citizen’s houses without reason.
<em>The situation that best illustrates how the principle of limited government aims to protect individual rights is the government is specifically forbidden from searching citizen’s houses without reason. </em>
Limited government is the principle that establishes that is not acceptable to have an overarching government or a government that extends its limits beyond the right of privacy of the citizens unless there is a valid and legal reason to do so. Limited government also means that the government limits its intervention regarding the liberties of an individual. That is why the situation that best illustrates how the principle of limited government aims to protect individual rights is the government is specifically forbidden from searching citizen’s houses without reason.
Its a controversy between whether or not the idea was adopted in England prior to 1066. But the word comes from a French word meaning to "I swear under oath". First place recorded of having a jury was in America during the Pilgrims era for a murder case. Hope that helps.
-Tralynn<span />
