Answer:
b. Feedforward control
Explanation:
Feedforward control is a form of proactive control that includes measures that pertain to prevent certain consequences and safety hazards. This company wants to prevent their employees form getting injured from particles during manufacturing. So, this is an example of feedforward control, that aims to prevent, not react.
Answer:
Yes the inspector should be hired
Explanation:
Defective average = 0.03
inspection rate = 30 per hour
Cost of inspector = 8 per hour
Correction cost is $10 each
No inspection = 9/30
= 0.300
Inspector = 8/30
= 2.67
Yes the inspector should be hired
Answer:According to the article, when companies earn patents specifically to prevent competition, it hinders the innovation of products that might actually be better. For instance, Bruce Nolop describes how his company had to pay more attention to the "minefield of existing patents than on the expected value that we could bring to customers." Rosabeth Moss Kanter suggests a "use it or lose it" solution to this problem. She thinks that a company that patents an item would be forced to use the patented idea or product or risk losing the patent. This idea would encourage more competition and prevent patent abuse.
Explanation:
Answer:
Accounting rate of return = 20.53%
Explanation:
<em>The accounting rate of return is the average annual income expressed as a percentage of the average investment.</em>
The simple rate of return can be calculated using the two formula below:
Accounting rate of return
= Annual operating income/Average investment
× 100
Average investment = (Initial cost + scrap value)/2
= 30,000/2= 15,000
Accounting rate of return = ( 3080/15,000) × 100
= 20.53%
Accounting rate of return = 20.53%
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The answer is yes because education/training will make it so you have more experience/knowledge than the next worker
