A, B, E I think those are mostly good answers for this
I believe the answer for the first question is B and the second one A, hope I helped! :)
C. the bill would increase the number of fres states
On the continental expansion, Americans pushed Native Americans off their land making deals with them that favored the US more than the tribes. After that, Americans pushed their ideas to the areas being developed trying to make Native Americans abandon their own culture.
On the expansionism overseas the US returned the land to its original inhabitants, this happened in Cuba for example. This was the main difference between expansionism inside and outside the US.
The taking of Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines was a violation of fundamental American ideals of self-government and democracy, this was actually the main argument of Anti-Imperialists. Once the US had claimed the territory they established their own rule and define role/impact in each respective country. Conquering other territories and forcing them to abide by American ideals and culture goes against the idea of American freedom.
<u>Whigs and Democrats for a new political party:</u>
- The Democrats and Whigs were uniformly adjusted during the 1830s and 1840s.
- The Whigs additionally supported a government while Democrats favored state government.
- Whigs represented defensive duties, national banking, and government help for inside upgrades.
- Bondage is the thing that at last split up the Whig party in light of the fact that most northern Whigs put stock in annulling subjugation, while most southern Whigs thought the inverse.
- The Democrats were bound to grasp settlers' and states rights. In the mid 1850s, the two-party framework started to deteriorate because of enormous remote migration.
- By 1856 the Whig party had fell and been supplanted by another sectional gathering, the Republicans. However, by the 1850s, the Whigs broke down.
