Answer:- 
Step-by-step explanation:
The given ration is 16 :40
In fraction, the above ratio can be written as : 
To write the above fraction in lowest terms, we need to divide the numerator and the denominator by the greatest common divisor.
Since, 
, Hence, 8 is the greatest common divisor of 16 and 40.
Now, divide the numerator and denominator by 8, we get
Answer:
C. There isn't much evidence to support a conclusion that the presence of carpet is associated with an increase or decrease in the mean bacterial concentration of air.
Step-by-step explanation:
A. There are outliers in these data, so we can't rely on the two-sample t test.
There are no outliers, as the seven rooms for both sample have similar size and function.
B. This test is unreliable because the populations we're sampling from are heavily skewed.
We don't know if the populations are heavily skewed, but this effect should be appeased by the sampling.
C. There isn't much evidence to support a conclusion that the presence of carpet is associated with an increase or decrease in the mean bacterial concentration of air.
Correct conclusion, as the P-value is surely greater than the significance level (usually 0.10 at most).
D. There is fairly strong evidence to support a conclusion that the presence of carpet is associated with an increase or decrease in the mean bacterial concentration of air.
There is no evidence as the P-value is greater than the significance level.
Answer:
Katie saved $20.
Step-by-step explanation:
I assume that "served" is a typo for "saved". Also, I assume that Tata and Ted are the same person.
Let the amount Katie saved = k
Then, ted saved $6 less than 4 times k, or 4k - 6.
The total saved by both is k + 4k - 6.
The total saved by both is $94.
k + 4k - 6 = 94
5k - 6 = 94
5k = 100
k = 20
Answer: Katie saved $20.
4000 grams in 40 hectograms
