Answer:
yes that is true
Explanation:
it is true because I I agree and my mental mind gave me the same answer
Answer:
In this scenario, a representative democracy would be best.
Explanation:
In this situation where the head of state has been engaging in corruption it would be good to have a representative democracy or what is sometimes called indirect democracy. In this kind of government people vote for their leaders and they are charged with representing them. The laws in society are therefore representative of the people and the representatives can vote on whether to remove the leader ahead of his term or whether some other sanction is appropriate. There are checks and balances in this kind of system that assures the executive does not gain too much power. It is also unlikely this leader will be voted in for a third term given his corrupt practices.
Answer:
b. most research in social psychology builds off of prior research relatively slowly and systematically
Explanation:
Social psychology studies the psychology of a group of individuals in a called a society. Social psychologists studies the effect that the group has on the individual and the effect that the individual has on the group.
Social psychologists hypothesize how and why the effects take place. Then these hypothesis are tested by the social psychologist who first proposed the hypothesis, then if the hypothesis holds true the hypothesis is accepted.
This hypothesis is then tested in different situations and if the hypothesis still holds true the hypothesis becomes accepted widely. If the hypothesis does not hold true modifications are suggested after which the modified hypothesis is tested. If the modified hypothesis holds true then the modified hypothesis is accepted and the previous hypothesis is corrected.
Technology development over the years
