Answer: Antifederalists argued that a bill of rights was necessary because, the supremacy clause in combination with the necessary and proper and general welfare clauses would allow implied powers that could endanger rights. Federalists rejected the proposition that a bill of rights was needed.
Explanation:
<u>Answer:</u>
No, the government under the Constitution does not have that ability now.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The early governments that were not bound by established rules could implement new decisions through their own conscience every other day.
- Such governments had given themselves the ability to conduct governance the way they thought was right for society.
- In other words, they had the ability to govern the governed without the consent of governed.
- This undue ability of the governments got limitations as the Constitution came into being.
Answer: C. Labor unions
Hope this helped!!... :D
Please correct me if I'm wrong!!.. :3
You already put the answer soooo
No one. Jk whats up i can help you
