In the presently stated speech, Laura would be arguing from the point of causation.
<u>Explanation:</u>
When arguing from the point of causation, the speaker or presenter would base her arguments and claims concerning evidence which proves that certain events almost always bring about the same results, or likewise, certain events would always almost eradicate the effects of the events.
Hence here, Laura is speaking from the point of causation.
A form/branch of government independent from the law.
This study is called humanism.
Answer:
Prejudiced action against a group of people.
Explanation:
In the chapter "Race and Ethnicity", the term discrimination has been defined as 'actions against a group of people.' The difference between prejudice and discrimination has been discussed in terms of thoughts and actions. The ills of discrimination tend towards forming the background of many social problems. Discrimination is largely analyzed on race and ethnicity which gives birth to unfair practices. Many anti-discrimination laws have been implemented to culminate discrimination.
Greater excitability of the "amygdala" may explain why...
The amygdala is fundamental for deciphering feelings, especially threatening stimuli. Outer stimuli travel to the amygdala by means of two distinctive pathways, which supplement one another. A short, uncertain course originates from the thalamus, which gets sensory stimuli and enables us to get ready for potential threat before knowing precisely what the threat is. A more exact course originates from the medial prefrontal cortex, the zone of the mind that is associated with the final phase of dread, in which the cerebrum responds to risk and picks a plan.
