Answer:
The idea of rule of law is that once the laws are made, everyone should follow them, both the citizens of the country and the government of the country. ... This is quite important because it means that the government can't do whatever it wants. It has to follow the rules that have been set.
Explanation:
Answer:
It's b
Explanation: She is in her early 40s and taking care of the upbringing of her young children and assisting her aging parents
Answer:
D) All of the above
Explanation:
This theory was created by the Austrian School in order to explain and understand the market growth based on the credit increase proposed by bank institutions (a central bank). In other words, this theory arguments that the economic cycles, especially financial crisis and recession, are caused by the "creation" of the money. How this money will be used and the result of this application is the central concern of this theory.
The answer is already there in your question.
The protagonist is a common citizen that is reading a book in his house when he becomes unsettled. The protagonist is working for NASA and holds expertise in extraterrestrial matters. The protagonist would rather be somewhere other than his house playing monopoly. The protagonist works with the government to conduct research on out-of-the-ordinary occurrences.
The protagonist is the main character whose fate is most closely felt by the reader or audience, and opposed by the antagonist. Antagonists resist by providing obstacles and complications and creating conflicts that test the protagonist, exposing the strengths and weaknesses of the protagonist's character. The protagonist is commonly also referred to as a 'hero'.
Learn more about the protagonist:
brainly.com/question/5396057
#SPJ4
Answer:
Substantive due process
Explanation:
The substantive due process theory of the constitutional law that prohibit the government from violating the rights of the defendant during the due process.
The first amendment protect the government to prevent the citizens from exercising their free will. Since on the case above the dog fighting is not illegal in japan , the defendant could make a case that the government is violating first amendment during the due process (since he is not informed why he is sentenced from exercising activities that he believed as legal) and can be used as a basis for his appeal.
