1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kotykmax [81]
3 years ago
14

What are the arguments for and against electing judges by election

Law
1 answer:
garik1379 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

hey are u in connections academy us history class

You might be interested in
Please help me. im not sure if it’s 1, 2, or 3. i’ll mark brainliest if it’s correct :))
evablogger [386]
The one you picked is correct!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Misuse of technology in a complex social problem in points​
Andru [333]

Answer:

im not sure but good luck

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Jack purchases a cola drink at a fast food chain, while drinking he determines the cola is a caustic drain cleaner. Jack may sue
Natali [406]

Answer:

breach of the implied of merchantability

Explanation:

Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.

5 0
3 years ago
In which case did the Supreme Court state that a seizure has occurred if the officer's conduct in conjunction with the questioni
german

Answer:

terry v. ohio

Explanation:

Terry v. Ohio, in 1968, was a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not in violation when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

7 0
3 years ago
Sanitation rules are established by:
ioda

Answer:

The answer is probably C because I looked it up on the internet.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain two features of the nature of God.<br> (4 marks)
    15·1 answer
  • Which step in the progression of a criminal case requires the government to
    7·2 answers
  • I NEED HELP ASAP !!!
    8·1 answer
  • Planning to kill someone, and taking the first step toward it is an example of which of the following?
    8·2 answers
  • The husband says: “I know what I’m doing. Its not my first time.” Why is his arugment a generalization?
    8·1 answer
  • If I commit a war crime during a civil war, would it be called a war crime or a civil war crime?
    13·1 answer
  • Discuss the claim that foreign policy and domestic policy are two faces of the same coin. give me full answers.​
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Why does the U.S. have a representative government?
    10·1 answer
  • Is the Senate in Canada democratic? Why or why not? Explain your answer.
    8·1 answer
  • in which of the following areas did regional interests and perspectives have the least impact on national policy?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!