1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
eduard
3 years ago
7

Assuming a court did find there was a valid offer, if there was an action brought against the store, would Vinny's mistake of gi

ving the newspaper the wrong price relieve the store of liability?
A. No, because it is a mutual mistake between Vinny and the newspaper, therefore any contract could be rescinded.
B. Yes, because a unilateral mistake always allows contracts to be rescinded by either party.
C. Yes, since the mistake would be obvious to a reasonable person.
D. No, because it is a unilateral mistake, and therefore whoever made the mistake cannot use it as a defense.
Business
2 answers:
slavikrds [6]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C. Yes, since the mistake would be obvious to a reasonable person.

Explanation:

A unilateral mistake <u>occurs when only one party is mistaken as to the subject matter</u> or the terms contained in the contract agreement.

<u>The general rule involving unilateral mistakes is that, if the non-mistaken party either knew or should have known of the other party's mistake, the mistake is a “palpable unilateral mistake” which makes the contract voidable</u> by the mistaken party.

Therefore, since Vinny's mistake would have been obvious to the other party, it could make the contract voidable and relieve the store of the liability.

Mice21 [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

C) Yes, since the mistake would be obvious to a reasonable person.

Explanation:

Under common law, employers are responsible for the actions of their employees, this follows the respondeat superior doctrine. This doctrine only applies to negligent acts or omissions by the employees in the course of employment.

The key issue here is if the employer directed the behavior of the employee, or if the employee's action actually caused a harm. It is really difficult for an employer to claim that they have no control over the actions of their employees. In this specific case, the store can claim that the employee's actions did't cause any harm, because it was just a simple mistake that any reasonable person could have noticed.

You might be interested in
You are trying to decide whether to repaint your house or install vinyl siding. The vinyl siding will cost $13,000 today and wil
emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

we will find present value of cost over 25 years for both alternatives and would choose one which lowest PV of cost.

Vinyl siding

Cost today (start of year 1) = PV = $13,000

It will last for 25 years

Painting:

Start of year 1:

Cost Incurred today = $3,500

Cost of replacing the boards today (which will last for 25 years) = $2,500

Start of year 6:

Cost Incurred at start of year 6 = $3,500 * (1 + 5%) 5 Annual Inflation rate being 5%

PV of this cost = $3,500 * (1 + 5%) 5 / (1 + 10%) 5

Start of year 11:

Cost Incurred at start of year 11 = $3,500 * (1 + 5%) 10

PV of this cost = $3,500 * (1 + 5%) 10 / (1 + 10%) 10

Start of year 16:

Cost Incurred at start of year 16 = $3,500 * (1 + 5%) 15

PV of this cost = $3,500 * (1 + 5%) 15 / (1 + 10%) 15

Start of year 21:

Cost Incurred at start of year 21 = $3,500 * (1 + 5%) 20

PV of this cost = $3,500 * (1 + 5%) 20 / (1 + 10%) 20

Total PV of all costs = 3500 + 2500 + 3500 * (1 + 5%) 5 / (1 + 10%) 5 + 3500 * (1 + 5%) 10 / (1 + 10%) 10 + 3500 * (1 + 5%) 15 / (1 + 10%) 15 + 3500 * (1 + 5%) 20 / (1 + 10%) 20

= $14,093.94

As such PV of cost Vinyl siding is lower at $13,000 than the PV of cost at $14,093.94 in case of painting.

Thus, you would prefer to install the vinyl siding

4 0
3 years ago
A résumé should be only one or two typed pages.<br> True or False
padilas [110]

Answer:  A resume should typically be only one page in length. However, there are certain circumstances under which a two-page resume is acceptable. So the answer is <u>True.</u>

Hope this helps!

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Crockin Corporation is considering a machine that will save $9,000 a year in cash operating costs each year for the next six yea
Roman55 [17]

Answer:

IRR = 16.5%

Explanation:

T<em>he IRR is the discount rate that equates the present value of cash inflows to that of cash outflows. At the IRR, the Net Present Value (NPV) of a project is equal to zero  </em>

<em>If the IRR greater than the required rate of return , we accept the project for implementation  </em>

<em>If the IRR is less than that the required rate , we reject the project for implementation  </em>

IRR = a% + ( NPVa/(NPVa + NPVb)× (b-a)%

NPV = PV of annual savings - initial cost

PV of annual savings = A× (1- (1+r)^(-n) )/r

A- annual savings in operating cost , r- rate of return, n- number of years

NPVa  at 10% discount rate

PV of cash inflow = (9,000×  1-1.1^-6)/0.1 =   39,197.35  

NPV =    65,328.91 - 33,165 =  6,032.35  

NPVb at 20% discount rate

PV of cash inflow = (9,000×  1-1.2^-6)/0.2=  (3,235.41)

NPV = 29,929.59  -33,165 = (3,235.41)

IRR = a% + ( NPVa/(NPVa + NPVb)× (b-a)%

IRR = 10% + ( (6,032.35/(6,032.35 +3,235.41) )× (20-10)%= 16.51%

IRR = 16.5%

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following organisations is most likely to sell shares for sale to invited investors?
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

C. Private limited company

Explanation:

Ownership in a private limited company is restricted, unlike in a public limited company. The shareholders of a private limited company are usually family members, close friends, or people with a shared interest.

A private limited company can raise capital by selling additional shares. Because becoming a shareholder in a private limited company is restricted, private companies raise capital by selling shares to existing shareholders or to invited investors.

5 0
3 years ago
A company uses the percent of sales method to determine its bad debts expense. At the end of the current year, the company's una
ValentinkaMS [17]

Answer: $5,440

Explanation:

When using the percent of sales method to determine bad debts, the company estimates a percentage that it believes will results in uncollectible debt and then applies it to the sales/revenue figure. The figure that is calculated is then debited along with the debit balance on the Allowance for doubtful accounts to the Bad debts account for the year and credited to the Allowance for doubtful accounts.

This company estimates that they will have 0.6% of credit sales uncollectible.

There are also $790,000 in sales of which all are on credit.

The Uncollectible estimate is therefore,

= 790,000 * 0.6%

= $4,740

This figure is then added to the debit amount on the Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts.

= 4,470 + 700

= $5,440

Note; A debit balance on the Allowance for doubtful debt account signifies that the bad debts were higher than anticipated the last time. This is why the figure is added to the current bad debts expense.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Did toilet paper cause a change in supply or quantity
    9·1 answer
  • A company’s book value increases when a company retains its net income.<br> a) true<br> b) false
    14·1 answer
  • A letter of intent is a type of mini-proposal. Which type of letter is often included at the beginning of a technical report
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the formal process of measuring performance and comparing this performance to marketing​ objectives? A
    9·1 answer
  • Anderson Corporation has provided the following production and average cost data for two levels of monthly production volume. Th
    15·1 answer
  • What is the term applied to the amount that net sales exceeds cost of goods sold on an income statement?
    8·1 answer
  • There are no preferred dividends in arrears, the balances in the Accounts Receivable and Inventory accounts are unchanged from J
    8·1 answer
  • China's growth rate has___
    5·1 answer
  • Williams Company plans to issue bonds with a face value of $605,000 and a coupon rate of 6 percent. The bonds will mature in 10
    6·1 answer
  • A 40-year old taxpayer has owned a Roth IRA for more than 5 years. A $10,000 distribution will be considered nonqualified if the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!